In 2026, you can change your password in seconds. You can verify your identity with biometrics. You can open a bank account online without ever touching paper.
But in several states, if you want to legally change your name, you may still be required to publish that change in a newspaper.
Yes. A physical newspaper.
And if you are transgender, that requirement can force you to publicly connect your former name to your current identity in a way that feels less like administrative transparency and more like state mandated outing.
The justification is “fraud prevention.” The reality is something far more complicated and far more harmful. It is time to ask a simple question. Why are we still doing this?
What Court Publication Requirements Actually Are
In many states, when someone petitions the court for a legal name change, they are required to publish notice of that petition in a local newspaper for a set number of weeks. The notice typically includes:
• Your current legal name
• The name you wish to adopt
• The court where the petition is filed
• The hearing date
The idea is that members of the public have an opportunity to object if the person is attempting to avoid debts, criminal liability, or financial obligations.
On paper, it sounds procedural and neutral. In practice, it is a relic of the 19th century that has not meaningfully evolved to reflect modern identity systems, digital records, or the realities of transgender safety.
Most fraud today is not committed by people legally changing their names in open court. It is committed through stolen identities, digital breaches, shell corporations, and synthetic identities created entirely online.
Yet the law continues to treat transgender people seeking affirmation as though they are potential fugitives.
The Origins of the Rule
Publication requirements emerged in an era when communities were small, records were local, and public notice in a newspaper was considered the most effective way to alert creditors and neighbors.
It was a time before:
• Social Security numbers
• Digital banking systems
• Federal identity databases
• Credit reporting agencies
• Background check technology
Back then, changing your name could genuinely allow someone to disappear in a way that would frustrate creditors.
Today, your identity is tied to far more than a name. It is tied to government databases, biometric data, tax records, employment history, and credit files.
If you attempt to escape debt through a legal name change, you will quickly discover that creditors track Social Security numbers, not newspaper announcements.
The fraud prevention argument survives largely because it has always been there, not because it is still effective.
Why This Disproportionately Harms Transgender People
For cisgender individuals changing their name after marriage, divorce, or personal preference, publication may feel like an inconvenience.
For transgender people, it can be a safety risk.
Publication creates a public, searchable connection between a deadname and a chosen name. Even if the physical newspaper circulation is small, many legal notices are now digitized and archived online.
That means:
• Search engines can index your former name.
• Data brokers can scrape and resell it.
• Harassers can weaponize it.
• Employers or acquaintances can find it years later.
Trans people already face disproportionate rates of harassment, employment discrimination, and violence. Outing someone through forced publication adds another layer of vulnerability.
It is not hypothetical. It is documented.
Advocates have repeatedly raised concerns that publication requirements increase the risk of stalking, domestic violence exposure, and targeted harassment.
In states with anti transgender political climates, the risks can escalate further.
The Privacy Double Standard
Here is where things become particularly inconsistent.
Many states automatically seal or protect court records involving:
• Minors
• Survivors of domestic violence
• Adoption proceedings
• Juvenile cases
Courts recognize that public exposure can create harm in these contexts.
Yet transgender adults seeking a name change often must prove that they face specific danger in order to request a waiver of publication. The burden is on them to demonstrate risk.
That flips the logic. Instead of asking whether publication is necessary, courts ask whether the individual has suffered enough to deserve privacy.
Fraud prevention is treated as a default concern. Personal safety becomes an exception.
The Waiver Process Is Not Equal Access
In some jurisdictions, a petitioner can ask the court to waive publication requirements by arguing that publication would endanger them.
But this process can require:
• Filing additional motions
• Providing evidence of threat or harassment
• Attending extra hearings
• Paying additional fees
Not everyone has the resources, documentation, or emotional stamina to navigate that process.
And not every trans person has already experienced documented threats, even if the broader climate makes them reasonably fearful.
Safety should not require proving prior victimization.
The Financial Burden
Publication is not free.
Newspapers charge for legal notices. The cost can range from modest to several hundred dollars depending on the region and length of required publication.
For transgender people already navigating medical costs, document updates, and potential employment instability, these fees add up.
When you layer court filing fees, certified copies, ID updates, passport changes, and professional license amendments, the total cost of legally aligning your name with your identity can easily reach hundreds or thousands of dollars.
Fraud prevention rhetoric rarely acknowledges the economic barrier this creates.
Does It Actually Prevent Fraud?
There is little contemporary evidence that newspaper publication meaningfully deters fraud.
Modern fraud detection systems rely on:
• Identity verification databases
• Financial monitoring algorithms
• Government issued identifiers
• Credit reporting agencies
If someone changes their legal name, their prior name remains attached to their Social Security number and financial record. Creditors are not dependent on scanning local newspapers to track debtors.
In fact, fraudulent actors rarely use formal legal name changes. They use stolen identities or synthetic ones that never go through court at all.
Publication requirements persist largely because they have not been reevaluated, not because they have been empirically validated.
The Digital Afterlife of Legal Notices
Even if a newspaper has limited local readership, online archiving changes everything.
Legal notices are often:
• Indexed by search engines
• Stored indefinitely
• Scraped by data aggregation sites
• Replicated across legal databases
A single publication can create a permanent digital footprint.
Transgender people spend significant time trying to reduce the visibility of their deadname online. Court publication requirements actively undermine that effort.
You can request removal from some platforms, but you cannot erase public court notices once archived.
The state effectively becomes a source of involuntary disclosure.
The Psychological Impact
There is also an emotional dimension that rarely gets discussed in legal debates.
A name change for a transgender person is not cosmetic. It is an affirmation of identity, often tied to years of internal work.
Being required to publicly announce your former name can feel like reopening a wound.
It can feel like being forced to perform a before and after narrative for public consumption.
That experience reinforces a broader social message that transgender identities are subject to scrutiny in ways cisgender identities are not.
Where Reform Is Happening
Some states have begun modernizing their laws.
Reforms have included:
• Eliminating publication requirements entirely
• Automatically sealing name change records
• Allowing confidential filings without proof of danger
• Simplifying waiver processes
These changes recognize that privacy and fraud prevention are not mutually exclusive.
Courts can still notify relevant agencies and creditors through modern databases without broadcasting identity transitions to the public.
States that have removed publication requirements have not reported widespread fraud spikes tied to name changes.
That fact alone should prompt a serious reevaluation in states that continue the practice.
Here is a clean, publication-ready section you can insert into the article under a heading. Standard paragraph format. No long dashes.
How to Determine Your State’s Name Change Requirements
If you are considering a legal name change, the most important first step is verifying the exact requirements in your state and, in some cases, your specific county. Name change laws are governed at the state level, but procedures are often implemented locally. That means the process in one county courthouse may look slightly different from another just a few miles away.
Start with your state’s official judicial branch website. Avoid relying solely on blogs or third-party summaries, especially if they are outdated. Look for sections labeled “self-help,” “civil name change,” or “petition for name change.” These pages typically outline eligibility requirements, filing fees, fingerprinting rules if applicable, and whether publication is required.
Next, confirm whether publication in a newspaper is mandatory. Some states require publication for all adult name changes. Others automatically waive publication for safety reasons in cases involving domestic violence, stalking, or gender identity. A growing number of states have eliminated publication requirements entirely. Do not assume your state follows the same rules as a neighboring one.
If publication is required, look closely at the waiver process. Many states allow petitioners to request confidentiality, but the burden and documentation standards vary. You may need to file a separate motion asking the judge to seal the record or waive public notice. In some jurisdictions, simply stating that publication would jeopardize your safety due to gender identity is sufficient. In others, courts may request supporting documentation.
It is also important to verify costs. Filing fees can range widely. Some states offer fee waivers for individuals with low income. If finances are a concern, look for “in forma pauperis” or fee waiver applications on the court website.
Beyond the court order itself, research what agencies require updates after the name change is granted. These usually include:
• Social Security Administration
• Department of Motor Vehicles
• U.S. Passport Office
• Banks and financial institutions
• Professional licensing boards
• Educational institutions
Understanding the full scope early helps prevent surprises later.
If the process feels overwhelming, consider reaching out to local LGBTQ legal organizations or state ACLU chapters. Many provide step by step guides tailored to transgender individuals, and some offer direct assistance or pro bono representation.
Finally, remember that laws change. Publication requirements are actively being challenged and revised in several states. Even if you have looked into the process before, verify the most current rules before filing.
Your name is not paperwork. But the paperwork matters. Taking the time to understand your state’s requirements can protect your privacy, reduce delays, and help you move forward with confidence.
The Broader Pattern of Bureaucratic Lag
Publication requirements are part of a larger pattern. Systems built in a pre digital era often fail to account for marginalized identities in a modern context.
Transgender people frequently encounter outdated policies in:
• Health insurance records
• Professional licensing boards
• Educational transcripts
• Voter registration systems
Each friction point sends the same message. The system was not designed with you in mind. But systems can evolve. They have before.
Marriage laws evolved. Adoption laws evolved. Identification laws evolved. So can name change laws.
What Advocates Are Arguing
Legal advocates are not asking courts to ignore fraud.
They are asking for modernization.
They argue that:
• Identity verification systems are stronger than ever.
• Fraud risk can be addressed through internal databases.
• Public safety concerns should outweigh symbolic transparency.
• Privacy should be the default, not the exception.
When publication rules were created, the newspaper was the most powerful information tool available.
Today, it is a digital archive with indefinite memory. The consequences are different.
Why This Matters Beyond Trans Communities
While transgender people are disproportionately harmed, reform would benefit others as well.
- Survivors of domestic violence.
- Individuals fleeing abusive families.
- People changing their names for religious or cultural reasons.
- Those rebuilding their lives after incarceration.
Privacy in name changes is not a niche issue. It is a question about how we balance transparency with safety in a digital age.
The Bottom Line
Court publication requirements for name changes were built for a world that no longer exists.
They were designed when identity was local and paper based. We now live in a world where identity is networked, indexed, and permanently archived.
For transgender people, forced publication can mean forced outing. Fraud prevention should be grounded in evidence, not inertia.
If modern financial systems do not rely on newspaper notices to track debt, why should trans people be required to publish their identity shifts as a condition of recognition?
The law should protect people from harm, not expose them to it.
And when a policy disproportionately burdens a marginalized group without demonstrable benefit, the responsible question is not whether it has always been that way.
The responsible question is why we have not fixed it yet.
