A conspiracy trend circulating in far-right social media circles has recently focused on Charlie Kirk, the late founder of Turning Point USA, and his widow, Erika Kirk. The trend, widely known as transvestigation, relies on false claims about physical features such as jawlines, shoulders, bone structure, and vocal tone to argue that public figures are secretly transgender. The Kirks have become the newest targets of this growing online movement.
Speculation about Erika Kirk began in mid-September, shortly after Charlie Kirk was fatally shot on September 10 at Utah Valley University. Large social media groups dedicated to transvestigation shared archived images of Erika from her pageant years, comparing her collarbones, hip structure, and facial angles in an attempt to claim she is transgender. Participants in these forums often used slurs and demeaning language, and their claims relied entirely on subjective interpretations of photos rather than any credible evidence.
RELATED: Transvestigating: A Weapon of Misinformation Hurting All Genders
The conspiracies soon expanded to include Charlie Kirk himself. Posts circulated asserting that he was secretly a woman or part of a larger plot designed to hide a supposed truth about his gender. These claims did not offer documentation or factual support and instead followed the same pattern of analyzing still images, guessing about physical proportions, and mislabeling normal variations in human appearance.
Researchers who study extremist online movements have previously noted that transvestigation is rooted in transphobia and misogyny. The trend depends on the idea that gender can be determined by a checklist of physical traits and that anyone who falls outside narrowly defined expectations is suspicious or deceitful. This ideology harms transgender people directly, but it also targets cisgender women by accusing them of being fraudulent if their bodies do not match rigid stereotypes.
The accusations aimed at the Kirks also demonstrate how these conspiracies operate without regard to political alignment. Charlie Kirk was a well-known critic of transgender rights, yet conspiracy communities still spread claims that he and his wife were hiding transgender identities. The contradictory nature of the accusations shows that the goal is not truth but attention, outrage, and content that can spread rapidly across social media.
Advocates warn that this trend has consequences beyond online harassment. Transvestigation fuels public mistrust of transgender people by framing gender diversity as something deceptive or criminal. It also encourages scrutiny of women whose bodies do not conform to narrow expectations, placing them at risk of harassment both online and in real life. The spread of these conspiracies contributes to an increasingly hostile climate for anyone who does not meet traditional gender norms.
The situation involving Charlie and Erika Kirk highlights the continued rise of transvestigation as an online phenomenon. The claims against them are unfounded, but the pattern mirrors what transgender individuals face regularly when their bodies are dissected and debated for entertainment or political attention. As these conspiracies gain traction, they deepen misunderstanding, increase stigma, and further endanger people whose gender expression does not align with these groups’ expectations.
